Skip to main content

Toulmin Method

Stephen Toulmin was a contemporary philosopher who broke down the anatomy of an argument. His book, The Uses of Argument, identifies 6 key elements of an argument -- The primary elements include the Claim, Grounds, and Warrant; the secondary elements include the Backing, Qualifier, and Rebuttal. 


Toulmin's concept that through analyzing these elements of an argument, you could analyze the overall logic of any argument. 

The CLAIM, also known as the assertion of proposition, is what you want your audience to believe. 
The GROUNDS, or evidence, is why your audience should believe your claim. Importantly, this is not an opinion.
The WARRANT, or inferential leaf, is how the audience is able to connect the grounds to the claim. 

These make up the primary elements of an argument and determine if an argument holds any weight whatsoever. The following is the secondary elements of an argument that provide further context and scrutiny.

The BACKING provides context and credibility to your warrant.
The QUALIFIER either limits or clarifies the claim and can make an argument harder to shoot down immediately.
The REBUTTAL is the anticipation of counterarguments. Many arguments can be based in just a sequence of rebuttals. 

These 6 elements can be used to effectively analyze the validity of any argument in a vacuum, but it does have its limitations when applied to real world scenarios. Arguments can naturally be intertwined with human elements like emotions -- sometimes emotions trump logic in arguments and this process doesn't account for that. The best way to take Toulmin's method and apply it to online communication is to keep the framework in the back of you mind when analyzing any arguments but also recognizes that nothing is fool proof and there will always be exceptions. 

There was a lot of good content in this weeks learning materials, but I also went out and found a short YouTube video produced by Texas A&M University that does a great job of succinctly describing the strengths and weaknesses of the Toulmin Method, check it out!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oversharing Online

Do different social networking sites offer other benefits and drawbacks? I think different social media sites inherently offer different strengths and weaknesses within their platform. Each network caters to a somewhat different audience -- Facebook still appeals to an older generation, offers long-form text capabilities and makes it easy to see each others "friends"; Twitter (or X) offers an onslaught of short-form text and videos, this is a platform that is perfect for breaking news and headlines; Instagram is an image based platform, this offers users an excess of visual content. All of these networks are slightly different, but they also share a lot more similarities than differences at their core -- especially when considering impact on mental health. Reference: https://www.statista.com/chart/30579/us-survey-girls-of-exposure-to-harmful-social-media-content/ This chart highlights a decent amount of access to mental health resources on social media. The problem is that th...

Digital Natives and Immigrants

According to Prensky, what category do you fall into, and how has this affected your learning? I'm a Digital Native. I enjoy being a Digital Native, and think it has served me well up to this point. I think there's probably levels to being a Digital Native -- Prensky wrote about this subject ~20 years ago now and the digital age has only continued to catapult itself into the future. I think that I'm probably one of the first generations of Digital Natives, born in 1997, right at the beginning of the .com boom and just as home PC's were about to enter the market is around the time that I was old enough to be capable of using them. I find myself today being shocked at what kids in elementary school can do with technology. So, while I'm certainly a Native and a lot of this digital era has come naturally to me and is still intuitive, I think there will be another shift. It won't just be Natives and Immigrants, technology is changing so much that kids today will now ...

The Battle for Public Opinion

Social Media has been shown to have immense power and influence over the general public. It has literally swayed elections all over the world, notably it was revealed that Russia used Facebook to influence the 2016 presidential election.  https://www.npr.org/2019/04/24/716374421/fact-check-russian-interference-went-far-beyond-facebook-ads-kushner-described The significant change in how public opinion is garnered is our digital world has changed everything about how politicians and corporations communicate with the rest of society. The ability to remain at least somewhat anonymous in the public sphere has also shifted the battle for public opinion -- notable people can now use proxies and ghost accounts to contribute to a public debate on their behalf. The nature of how social media works allows for increased use of propaganda and heavily filtered information to be touted and spread as the truth when frequently it could not be further from that. Social media has fundamentally change...